Saturday, February 17, 2007

Pearl Harbor


You all have probably seen this Hollywood movie before, or at least you probably have heard what it is all about I hope. It simply shows the tragic situation when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in Hawaii and later the American got them back worse. The movie is also combined with the triangle love story between three major people; two good friends Rafe McCawley and Danny Walker (Ben Affleck and Josh Hartnett) and a girl Evelyn (Kate Beckinsale).


Rafe and Danny grew up together and learned to fly in the dangerous aviation practice of crop-dusting. Both men joined the U.S. Army Air Corps where Rafe fell in love with a beautiful nurse Evelyn before volunteering to fight alongside the English pilots in the Battle of Britain. (Evelyn did Rafe a favor while examining his visual test by passing him. He could read poorly, therefore, he was not qualified to be a pilot. This is where they started to like each other.) Rafe left behind Evelyn and Danny who were soon stationed together at Pearl Harbor.
Since they both thought that Rafe died during fighting in Britain, they stayed close to each other and helped healing one another’s heart. Then they fell deeply in love and suddenly Rafe surprisingly returned from death. Rafe was mad at both of the two but before starting to make thing clear, it came the attack from the Japanese. After the Japanese pulling back, the two men, who were the greatest fliers, were put in the top secret mission, by Colonel Dolittle to fly to Japan and take revenge on the Japanese. In the end, sad-but-true, Danny died and right before that, he acknowledged the truth that he was going to be a father because Evelyn was pregnant.

Well... this is pretty much about it. This summary is not that interesting and encouraging that is why you guys need to watch the movie by yourself. It is absolutely awesome! Trust me. Even though some websites say that it’s inaccurate, but I’m sure you will learn a lot from it as I have myself. So go watch it, go, go, go!

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Say's Law

Say's Law, also known as Say's Law of Markets, is named after Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832), Say's Law argued that an economy is self-regulating p[rovided that all prices, including wages, are flexible enough to maintain it in equilibrium.
In a more simplistic, and showewhat inaccurate form, Say's law states that supply creates its own demand and over-production is impssible. This theory has major implications for how governments respond to periods of high unemployment or widespread underemployment.

Say's law was accepted as a major plank in classical macroeconomic theory until English economist John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) challenged its applicability in modern economies.


Jean-Baptiste Say was born in Lyons to a family of textile merchants of Huguenot extraction. In 1787, after spending two years in England apprenticed to a merchant, Say took a job at an insurance company in Paris run by Claviere (later to become Minister of Finance). An ardent republican, Say was overjoyed by the French Revolution. He served as a volunteer in the 1792 military campaign to repulse the allied armies from France.

It was around this time that Say read Adam Smith's book and the work of and fell into with a group of laissez-faire economists, known as the ideologues, who sought to relaunch the spirit of Enlightenment liberalism in republican France. From 1794 to 1800, Say served as the editor of their journal, La Decade philosophique. His 1800 essay, Olbie, was submitted to a contest run by the Institut de France. Say's eminence grew such that he was nominated to the Tribunate in 1799, sitting in the finance section.

In 1803, he published his most famous work, Treatise on Political Economy. Say's distinctive approach to economics was an outcome of the muddled marriage of Condillac's utility theory of demand and Adam Smith's cost theory of supply. Value, Say claimed (with some inconsistency), was the outcome of the interaction of these two. In this respect, it departs considerably from the Classical Ricardian School, where value is determined purely from the cost side. Say's approach was taken up
by French Liberal School and he can be considered a precursor of the Marginalist Revolution. Like Cantillon before him and the Austrian School after him, Say also placed great emphasis on the risk-taking entrepreneur and even tried to include him as the "fourth" factor of production in his analysis.

It was also in the Treatise that Say outlined his famous law of markets. Roughly stated, Say's Law claims that total demand in an economy cannot exceed or fall below total supply in that economy or as James Mill was to restate it, "supply creates its own demand." In Say's language, "products are paid for with products" (1803: p.153) or "a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another", (1803: p.178-9.). Or:

"It is worth while to remark, that a product is no sooner created, than it, from that instant, affords a market for other products to the full extent of its own value. When the producer has put the finishing hand to his product, he is most anxious to sell it immediately, lest its value should diminish in his hands. Nor is he less anxious to dispose of the money he may get for it; for the value of money is also perishable. But the only way of getting rid of money is in the purchase of some product or other. Thus the mere circumstance of creation of one product immediately opens a vent for other products." (J.B. Say, 1803: p.138-9)
The radical laissez-faire notions expounded in the 1803 Treatise caught the attention of Napoleon Bonaparte himself. Summoning Say to a private meeting, Napoleon demanded that Say rewrite parts of the Treatise to conform with his attempt at creating a war economy, built on protectionism and regulation. Say refused. Napoleon proscribed the Treatise and had Say ousted from the Tribunate in 1804.

Although offered another post as compensation, Say was too disgusted by the imperial regime. He moved to Pas-de-Calais and set up a cotton factory at Auchy-les-Hesdins. He grew fabulously rich. In 1812, Say sold his shares and returned to Paris, living as a speculator.

After the fall of Napoleon in 1814, Say finally published the second edition of the Treatise. He then spent some time in England, met David Ricardo and Goodwin, and, upon his return in1815, published his 1815 reflections. The Bourbon restoration government showered Say with numerous dignities and honors. In 1816, he was invited him to deliver a course of lectures on economics at l'Athenee Royale, a private college. In 1819, he was appointed as Chair of Industrial Economy at the Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers. His popular lectures were published in 1828.

Say's law of markets came to divide economists in the General Glut Controversy around this time. Say joined in the fray, attacking the underconsumption thesis in his letters to Malthus (1820) and in his 1824 exchange with rival countryman Simonde de Sismondi in the Revue Encyclopedique.

In 1831, Say was granted a chair (the first in economics) at the prestigious Collegeede France. The French Liberal School which followed up on Say maintained an even more intimate connection with the establishment.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Saving Private Ryan


General Marshall: My Dear Mrs. Ryan, it’s with the most profound sense of joy that I write to inform you your son, Private James Ryan, is well and, at this very moment, on his way home from European battlefields. Reports from the front indicate James did his duty in combat with great courage and steadfast dedication even after he was informed of the tragic loss your family has suffered in this great campaign to rid the world of tyranny and oppression. I take great pleasure in joining the secretary of war, the men and women of the United States Army, and the citizens of a grateful nation in wishing you good health and many years of happiness with James at your side. Nothing, not even the safe return of a beloved son, can compensate you or the thousands of other American families who have suffered great loss in this tragic war. And I might share with you some words which have sustained me through long, dark nights of peril, loss and heartache. And I quote, “I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your bereavement and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom. Abraham Lincoln.” Yours very sincerely and respectfully, George C. Marshall, General, Chief Of Staff. This is the whole part of the message said by George C. Marshall to Mrs. Ryan that I’ve taken from the movie. I find it very downhearted and think that it probably would give you some idea; the same idea I have, that war is absolutely good for nothing.

Saving Private Ryan, directed by Steven Spielberg, basically shows the cruelty, loss, as well as the sacrifice taking place during the World War II through the eyes of Captain John H. Miller (Tom Hanks), who was ordered to go save and bring back Private James Francis Ryan (Matt Damon) home since he had already lost three brothers during the war and the government didn’t want his mother to suffer any more. (losing three sons is more than enough I believe!) Many of Captain Miller’s soldiers died during the journey and the captain himself died at the very end. Besides all the depressing parts, the movie itself is very interesting. Spielberg did really a great job by making it so realistic. It’s like you could feel all the gunshots running through you right at the same time as all the soldiers felt in the movie. The blood, the corpses, the gushing intestines all looked so real. I even jumped once when the German soldiers appeared and fired the M-16 at American soldiers. I remember I went to watch this movie by myself when it first came out in the theater years ago. How brave! LOL I was really petrified. Had never seen this kind of cruel-but-real movie before by that time. It’s really good, as worth spending almost 3-hour time watching. Watch it so you’d know that I’m not just babbling.

This part has nothing to do with the movie but I just feel like sharing it with you guys. LOL There’s also Vin Diesel starring in this movie, just so you know. Believe it or not, he’s nothing like in the movie XXX I have seen. He was someone far from the word “muscular”. Couldn’t recognize him myself but I just saw his name on the casting list. Hahaha

Tuesday, January 2, 2007

most sincere apology

dear a. cecil and all my lovely classmates,
i apologize for bloggin all my movie summary thingies so late. i seriously had hard times figurin out how to work it for weeks. when i was at the home page, thought i had to go sign in at "the old blogger" in stead of the new blogger google thing or whatever. anyways, i've succeeded posting almost all my movies now. you guys enjoy reading, analyzing, and criticiszing 'em, alright? one last thing, i havent got a chance to watch North and South yet as i've been preparin myself for midterm exam lately so i really have no time for it. therefore, you guys will still have to wait ok? lol gracias y adios!

Surviving X' Mas


Surviving X’ Mas is a very funny story of an eccentric millionaire named Drew (Ben Affleck), taking place in Chicago, Illinois. Drew had no family coz his father walked away when he was young and his mother died when he was 19 so he had nobody to spend his Christmas with. He couldn’t be with his girlfriend also because she wanted to be with her family instead. So he, then, rented the Valco family to spend his Christmas with for 250,000 dollars. The Valcos are Tom; father, Christine; mother, Brian; brother and the story got even more fun and sophisticated when Alicia; sister (Christina Applegate) arrived and didn’t want to play along. Drew also hired more crazy-people to play in this Christmas show of his. It somehow ended happily with Drew falling in love with Alicia and Tom getting back with Christine as they were about to get divorce. Wanna know how cute and hilarious the movie is… you guys gotta see it by yourself :P Merry X' Mas to you all!

Nevada Smith


Nevada Smith is a story about a boy named Max Sand (Steve McQueen) whose father was white and mother Kiowa Indian were terribly killed by three bandits when he was young. (Not that young actually, more like a teenager) Since he had nobody else left, he wanted to take revenge for his parents by hunting those three men and killing them all and what he got with him were only a gun, a horse and 8 bucks in his pocket. On the way to his success, Max did everything he possibly could to find those men. He was stolen his horse and his gun by three strangers. Later a guy named Jonas Cord, whom at first he was trying to rob (with an old, rusted short gun he found in the sand), saved his life by giving him food and teaching him how to shoot a gun. Once he killed the first murderer Jesse Coe, with help of a Kiowa girl named Neesa, he kinda threw himself into jail by attempting to rob a bank in New Orleans so he could meet the Kiowa Indians lived in this part. They all spoke perfectly American English as well.) Anyways, after already killed Bowdre while escaping from the jail in the swamp, Max went all the way back to the west (Nevada), where he changed his name as Nevada Smith, again to find the last murderer Tom Fitch and finished him there. He didn’t practically kill Fitch. He just shot him a couple of times and left him on the river bank so he could feel all the pains and torture his parents felt before they got killed and hung. What I also learn from this movie is that acting in the past kinda sucks. LOL It doesn’t really seem real or natural or whatever. But anyways, you guys should watch this movie I suggest and you’ll all like it.

Native Indians - Dances with Wolves


This great Indian movie is about the story of Lieutenant John J. Dunbar, who became a civil war hero and requested himself to go stay at the Fort Sedgewick where Indians were. He was first alone since there was nobody else in the area but later he made friends with the very friendly, harmonic and knowledgeable Sioux Indians. The hardest part was the communication as John (or all the whites) did not speak Sioux and the Sioux did not speak any English as they do today. But somehow they could communicate and understand each other practically through gestures and became good friends. Oh wait! There was a white woman named Christine, in Indian as Stands with a Fist, whose whole family was killed by the Pawnee Indians and was raised by the Sioux, who could still speak communicative and understandable English. She played a major role in helping both parties translating their languages and later married John, whom were called Dances with Wolves as the Sioux saw him dancing around the bonfire with a wolf (named Two Socks) beside him. John helped the Sioux killing the savage, uncivilized Pawnee who were coming to invade them by providing the army firearms. He then was called a traitor by the U.S. Army and while being sent to Fort Hays, he was rescued by the Sioux. All Americans were killed. (Hooray!) [Thirteen years later, their homes destroyed, their buffalo gone, the last band of free Sioux submitted to white authority at Fort Robinson, Nebraska. The great horse culture of the plains was gone and the American frontier was soon to pass in to history.] This movie is really interesting and impressive and I recommend everyone to watch it. It’s even more interesting about how they are named. (Take for examples, Kicking Bird, Wind in His Hair, Smiles a Lot, Ten Bears, Two Socks, and Black Shawl) It has all of what the A. Cecil said about the Indians in class. I guarantee that you’ll be deeply touched by “Dances with Wolves” for sure. Thank you.